Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria
On 19 February 2014, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria. The issue in the case was whether s21(1)(a) of the UK Limitation Act 1980 disapplies the statutory limitation period in respect of claims by a beneficiary under a trust against an accessory (a knowing recipient of trust property or a dishonest assistant) to a fraudulent breach of trust.
In particular, the court looked at the issue of whether a stranger to a trust who dishonestly assists in a breach of trust, or knowingly receives trust property paid out in breach of trust, is a ‘trustee’ within the meaning of s21(1)(a).
Lord Sumption (with whom Lords Neuberger and Lord Hughes agreed) held that the act is concerned only with actions against ‘true’ trustees, and a stranger to a trust (although he may have dishonestly assisted the true trustee or knowingly received trust property) is not himself a ‘true’ trustee and, accordingly, a claim against him is not within the scope of s21(1)(a)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Conyers Dill & Pearman briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Conyers Dill & Pearman
Briefings from Conyers Dill & Pearman
A high-level summary of the major commercial cases decided in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands.
Shareholder relief: Eastern Caribbean Appeal Court considers the just and equitable grounds for winding up a BVI company
This briefing concerns Wang Zhongyong v Union Zone Management Ltd.