Why are you creating that pre-action document? More on litigation privilege (especially if you are a liquidator)
Since the Starbev decision, the Court of Appeal has had the opportunity to review litigation privilege again in the appeal of the decision in Tchenguiz v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). In dismissing the appeal, and finding that no litigation privilege attached to the five reports in question, the court emphasised that documents must meet the dominant purpose test if they are to be covered by litigation privilege.
What is litigation privilege? Just to recap, a document that has the benefit of litigation privilege is protected from an opponent’s inspection. To gain that benefit, a document must be a confidential communication between a lawyer and a third party or a client and a third party, created when litigation was reasonably contemplated or under way and made for the dominant purpose of obtaining advice or information about that litigation.
The facts behind the Tchenguiz litigation are quite complex. Suffice to say that two brothers (the Tchenguiz) required inspection of five reports held by third parties (the liquidators) to assist their claim against the SFO for damages…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The courts have decided a number of high-profile cases this summer in which retailers have been involved in intellectual property disputes.
Southend-On-Sea Borough Council v Armour is a tenancy repossession case in which the tenant invoked a successful article 8 defence.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents