Whistleblowing — Panayiotou v Chief Constable Kernaghan
By Joanne Oliver
Can detriment or dismissal stemming from events closely connected to a protected disclosure be distinguished from the disclosure itself to avoid liability in whistleblowing claims?
Yes, according to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Panayiotou v Chief Constable Kernaghan.
In this case, Mr Panayiotou, a police officer, made a number of protected disclosures concerning the attitude of his colleagues towards certain racial groups and the victims of rape, abuse and domestic violence. His disclosures were investigated by Hampshire Police, and Mr Panayiotou was found to be largely correct in his concerns. However, he was not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation and the remedial action taken by the force. Mr Panayiotou began to right the wrongs he perceived within the force and to take the action he believed appropriate. He continued to raise numerous complaints and a great deal of management time was devoted to responding to his correspondence and investigating these complaints…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories