Whistleblowers: the new law
The Jimmy Saville, Hillsborough and Mid Staffs scandals could all be seen as cases where less damage would have been done if people had spoken out earlier. Although the reasons for these scandals are varied and complex, they exposed the legal protection for whistleblowers to closer scrutiny.
Partly in response to these concerns, significant changes to our whistleblowing legislation were introduced in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, which received Royal Assent in April 2013. These new provisions apply to disclosures made on or after 25 June.
Overall, they aim to increase protection for ‘genuine’ whistleblowers, while plugging a loophole that conferred protection on employees who were in effect complaining about their own personal employment position rather than matters in the public interest…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why