When is a termination payment a penalty?
The courts are frequently asked to determine whether a clause providing for payment of a fixed sum on breach of contract is a penalty (and unenforceable under English law) or a genuine pre-estimate of loss (‘liquidated damages’), in which case the clause will be enforceable. The approach of the courts can be summarised as: ‘Whether a provision is to be treated as a penalty is a matter of construction to be resolved by asking whether, at the time that the contract was entered into, the predominant contractual function of the provision was to deter a party from breaking the contract or to compensate the innocent party for breach. That the contractual function is deterrent rather than compensatory can be deduced by comparing the amount that would be payable on breach with the loss that might be sustained if breach occurred.’
An important point to bear in mind with penalty clauses — often forgotten — is that the rule against penalty clauses only applies where there is a breach of contract. If the trigger event is not a breach, then the payment (which will be a debt rather than damages) cannot be an unlawful penalty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.