What is the role of the Royal Court of Jersey in trustee applications for directions regarding disclosure of trust information?
In December 2013, the Royal Court of Jersey blessed the decision of the trustee of the Y Trust to refuse disclosure of information concerning the trust to the first respondent (Mrs B) in her capacity as former beneficiary of the trust (In the matter of the Y Trust  JRC 027). The application raised the issue of the function of the court, namely whether the court was exercising its own discretion in supervising and, where necessary, intervening in the administration of a trust or, on the facts of the case, giving its blessing to the proposed exercise of the trustee’s discretion.
The facts, in summary, were that the settlor was acquainted with the husband of Mrs B, namely Mr B, who, the trustee understood, assisted the settlor in the acquisition of real property held by the trust. Mr B was to be remunerated for his advisory services. The settlor requested that this remuneration be made through the trust by way of distributions to Mrs B. The trustee acceded to this request and, accordingly, Mrs B was made a beneficiary on 17 March 2010. Substantial distributions were made to her and at the settlor’s request she ceased to be a beneficiary on 6 September 2011.
In July 2013, the trustee received a letter from English solicitors acting for Mr and Mrs B seeking information in relation to the trust. Shortly thereafter, the trustee received a further letter from the English solicitors acting for Mr and Mrs B enclosing a letter before action on behalf of Mr B against the settlor…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
On 11 September the Guernsey Court of Appeal confirmed the test to be applied in determining whether a person should be added as a party to existing proceedings.
When a company is being wound up in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, should an anti-suit injunction be issued to prevent a creditor or member from pursuing proceedings in another jurisdiction?