What is the legal position when only one of two joint tenants gives notice to quit?
By Bukola Aremu
In the case of Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk, the defendant had been one of two joint tenants. Without his knowledge, the other tenant gave notice to quit to the council to terminate the tenancy. The defendant did not leave and the council sought possession. The court held that in absence of any express terms in the tenancy stating otherwise, one joint tenant can unilaterally terminate a periodic joint tenancy by giving proper notice to quit. The court doubted whether the tenant who gave notice to quit was in breach of trust towards the other tenant, but even if she was, that did not make the notice to quit a nullity. Accordingly, possession was granted.
Monk was revisited in the recent and similar case of Sims v Dacorum Borough Council  EWCA Civ 12. Mr and Mrs Sims were granted a joint introductory tenancy of a three-bedroom house on 15 March 2002. The tenancy agreement provided the following in regards to ending the tenancy…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.