What is in a name? The effect of a basis of the contract clause — revisited
Readers will recall the decision of Mr Justice Akenhead in Genesis Housing Association Ltd v Liberty Syndicate Management Ltd for and on behalf of Syndicate 4472 at Lloyd’s  EWHC 3105 (TCC) in which it was held that a misstatement in the proposal form constituted a breach of warranty due to the basis of the contract clause contained in the proposal form.
The insurer, Liberty Syndicates, was as a result discharged from all liability. Genesis was aggrieved by this decision and appealed. The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous judgment delivered by Lord Justice Jackson on 4 October 2013, has firmly upheld that decision, confirming the impact of basis clauses in proposal forms. It also considered the impact of the declaration of the signatory as to the accuracy of the information supplied.
The Court of Appeal also commented on the impact of a condition of the cover dealing with the right to avoid in the event of misrepresentation…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The Supreme Court has recently ruled that the buyers under a sale contract on GAFTA 49 terms could only recover nominal damages for the sellers’ wrongful cancellation of the contract.
Claimants with contractual claims against a Korean ship operator can go through London courts.