What does the MBI decision mean for the retirement village sector?
By Rhys Guild and Rebecca Healy
The Full Federal Court handed down its appeal decision in MBI Properties Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation  FCAFC 112 on 18 October 2013, regarding the goods and services (GST) consequences arising from the sale of leased residential property as a going concern.
The key issue considered in this case was whether a purchaser was liable to pay GST under Division 135 of the GST Act when they bought a leased residential building as a GST-free going concern. Until this case, it had been widely accepted (and vigorously asserted by the ATO) that such a liability was triggered by the purchaser making input-taxed supplies of leasing residential premises under the existing leases.
However, somewhat surprisingly, the Full Federal Court held that the purchaser could not be liable for the Division 135 GST liability because it did not make a supply of those leases. In other words, the leases were a supply made by the vendor when they were originally granted, so because the purchaser did not make any new supply it could not be subject to the Division 135 GST liability…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The High Court has handed down its decision in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker — ruling that the implied term of trust and confidence is not part of Australian law.
How would an organisation handle the reinstatement of a dismissed employee while the matter is being heard?