What are the obligations of a global custodian service provider in giving investment advice to its clients?
In Första AP-Fonden v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV and others  EWHC 3127 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the advisory obligations of a global custodian service provider and determined that the service provider had fallen short of its own reporting standards and that it had failed to present to the claimant the risks of default and loss in a fair manner and what alternatives there were to holding securities to maturity.
The claimant (Första) is one of five ‘buffer funds’ within the Swedish pension system. In October 2004, Första entered into a global custody agreement and subsequently, in December 2004, a securities lending authorisation agreement (SLAA) with the defendant bank (BNYM), under which BNYM managed Första’s securities lending programme. Various investment guidelines were incorporated into the SLAA. After initial negotiations, BNYM and Första had relatively limited direct contact. BNYM provided daily online reports to Första on the securities held in its cash re-investment portfolio. Reviews took place every six months to discuss the performance of the medium-term notes (MTNs).
Sigma Finance was added to BNYM’s approved list of issuers in August 2005. On five different occasions between March 2007 and October 2008, BNYM acquired MTNs from Sigma for Första’s account. BNYM did not seek Första’s approval for the acquisition nor was it required to do so under the terms of the SLAA. In around May 2007, BNYM became increasingly aware of potential problems with the Sigma securities. After a downgrade of the securities by the rating agencies and a steep reduction in their pricing, in May 2008 BNYM contacted Första about Sigma and the MTNs. Following this approach by BNYM, Första tightened its investment criteria but continued to hold the Sigma securities…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe