Webcast: the effect of disclosure orders on third parties
Welcome to the second in our series of four short webcasts in which we take a bite-sized look at some of the ways in which litigation and court orders can affect parties who are not participants in the relevant litigation.
In this webcast, Karla Sheerin-Griffin focuses on two of the remedies that are available to a person who has been wronged to obtain information from a person who is not, or is unlikely to become, a party to the litigation: orders for non-party disclosure under part 31.17 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR); and Norwich Pharmacal relief.
Sheerin-Griffin also discusses the consequences of failing to comply with an order for disclosure and the practical steps a non-party should take where an order for disclosure is made against them.
Click on the link below to watch this webcast from Stephenson Harwood.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe