Watch the clock — applying time limits for procurement challenges
By Jenny Beresford-Jones and Helen Prandy
Mills & Reeve has recently examined a couple of cases that illustrate two different approaches of the courts to the application of time limits for procurement challenges.
In Nationwide Gritting Services Ltd v The Scottish Ministers (2013), the court was sympathetic to the challenging bidder’s argument that a mere ‘suspicion’ that the contracting authority had breached the procurement rules was insufficient to start time running. The clock started ticking only at the point when the contracting authority in this case confirmed to the challenging bidder that it had indeed awarded the contract without any competition.
In contrast, in Corelogic Ltd v Bristol City Council (2013), the court strictly applied the 30-day time limit when it refused to allow the claimant bidder to expand its claim form so as to include new grounds for claim. These additional grounds fell outside those detailed in the claim form and the claimant had failed to amend its claim to include them within 30 days of its date of knowledge. As such, these new grounds for claim were out of time and no amendment to the claim form was permitted…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
Animal welfare: recent EU conference — mid-term review of the strategy for the welfare of animals 2012–15
The conference on the achievements of the EU strategy for the welfare of animals 2012–15: mid-term review took place on 12 February 2014.
In a decision in January, the Information Commissioner’s Office found that the Financial Conduct Authority had breached the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why