Warning to employers who regularly enhance redundancy payments
By Jayne Flint
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Peacock Stores v Peregrine has confirmed that where an employer consistently makes enhanced redundancy payments, such action could give rise to an implied contractual entitlement.
Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, a statutory redundancy payment is calculated using an employee’s age, week’s pay (capped at the current limit of £450 but due to increase to £464 on 6 April 2014) and length of service (up to a maximum of 20 years’ service).
From 1996 to 2002, Peacock Stores made redundancy payments in excess of the statutory entitlement. In particular, it did not cap the amount of a week’s pay nor the number of years’ service to be applied. This meant that an employee with, for example, 30 years’ service was credited with 10 years’ more service than the statutory scheme allows for…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
With NHS statistics suggesting obesity levels are increasing, a recent case has looked at whether obesity can amount to a disability and come within discrimination provisions.
Shoosmiths looks at what it could mean for UK businesses if Scotland decides to become an independent country.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…