US Supreme Court upholds freedom-of-contract principle in antitrust class arbitration
By Kiera S Gans and Davide Rossetti
In the recent case of American Express co et al v Italian Colors Restaurant et al, the US Supreme Court addressed the validity of a contractual waiver to class arbitration where the cost of individually arbitrating a federal statutory antitrust claim made it cost-prohibitive to raise those claims independently rather than as part of a collective class. The court’s conclusion in favour of upholding the agreement can be seen as a further re-affirmation of the principles of freedom of contract.
An agreement between the petitioners, American Express and a subsidiary, and the respondents, merchants who accept American Express cards, required all of their disputes to be resolved by arbitration and prohibited arbitration on a class-action basis.
Nonetheless, the respondents filed a class action in federal court arguing that American Express and its subsidiary had used their monopoly power in the market to charge higher rates than those for competing credit cards in violation of federal antitrust (also called anti-competition) laws…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper has released the 1 September 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
DLA Piper’s privacy experts have compiled a list of dos and don’ts for addressing privacy compliance in M&A transactions.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions