US: FTC mobile payments report will have impact on social-media-based offerings
There has been an explosion in the number and variety of mobile payments services available to consumers in the last couple of years, including several social-media-centric payments innovations. New payments products, including peer-to-peer services, mobile coupons, contactless options and mobile wallets, offer consumers and businesses significant flexibility and many new benefits. But regulators are concerned about the prospect of increased risks to consumers. The release of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) 8 March 2013 staff report, ‘Paper, Plastic… or Mobile? An FTC Workshop on Mobile Payments’, indicates the potential for new and greater regulatory scrutiny of this growing sector. The report discusses the key issues facing businesses and consumers in emerging mobile payments services and highlights the diverse mix of companies comprising the mobile payments ecosystem, including mobile carriers, payment card networks, financial institutions, merchants and others. It describes three primary evolving concerns, all of which are relevant to social-media-based offerings: data security; privacy; and dispute resolution.
The report — which follows up on a 2012 FTC workshop on the same topic — is a reminder to businesses developing or deploying mobile payments services, and the third parties with whom they share consumer data, that the FTC is continuing to monitor the industry and stands ready to enforce the law against deceptive or unfair practices. The FTC stakes out a claim for broad authority over mobile payments, asserting that it has jurisdiction over mobile phone carriers for non-common carrier activities (e.g. mobile carrier billing) and every other type of company involved in mobile payments except for depository institutions. Therefore, businesses in the mobile payments ecosystem — including social media platform providers, app developers and advertising networks — should assess their existing data privacy and security practices and other terms and conditions of service to ensure that they are consistent with evolving practices…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump