Up Close and Personnel — March 2014: dismissal for absence due to post-natal depression was not discriminatory
In Lyons v DWP Jobcentre Plus (2013), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld the decision of the Employment Tribunal that a woman who was dismissed after the end of her maternity leave due to absence caused by post-natal depression was not discriminated against on grounds of pregnancy. Although the claimant had been treated unfavourably for a pregnancy-related illness, this could only amount to pregnancy discrimination if the treatment had occurred during the ‘protected period’, i.e. the period between the beginning of the pregnancy and the end of maternity leave…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Bristows briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Bristows
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Bristows
The High Court has held that in certain circumstances the European Insolvency Regulations 1346/2000/EC may effectively extend the jurisdictional reach of the English courts.
A recent decision may result in a potentially more expansive basis for establishing jurisdiction over defendants in Europe.