Unwelcome outcomes for organisations that fail to take into account climate legal risk
DLA Piper recently provided a client update on the Queensland Planning and Environment Court decision of Rainbow Shores P/L v Gympie Regional Council & Ors. The decision in Rainbow Shores provides an example of what happens when there is a partial or complete failure to account for climate legal risk. This latest update considers the implications for organisations such as state and local governments and private corporations if they make the same mistake.
Climate legal risk is the risk of legal liability or adverse legal outcomes that can arise when the impacts of climate change affect an organisation’s operations.
The impacts are varied and can be direct, including those brought about by the increased intensity and frequency of flooding, bushfire and coastal hazards such as coastal erosion, storm tide and sea level rise inundation. But more often than not it is the indirect impacts, such as the risk of litigation, non-compliance with regulatory requirements or insurance failure, that cause greater concern because they give rise to issues that can often be more difficult to resolve…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that its new $43.7m next-generation market surveillance system has become operational.
In this briefing, DLA Piper sets out a summary of key items of interest announced by the chancellor in the UK Autumn Statement.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
Our list of the summer’s big deals shows how London law firms kept busy with work from Asia as well as more familiar sources