Unuathorised celebrity image on merchandise: Rihanna v Topshop
In March 2012, fashion retailer Topshop began to sell a T-shirt with an image of Rihanna on it. The image was based on a photograph taken by an independent photographer from whom Topshop had obtained copyright clearance. Topshop did not obtain a licence from Rihanna.
Rihanna brought a passing-off claim in the High Court against Topshop for the use of her image without her permission. She complained that the T-shirt was likely to deceive members of the public into believing that it was merchandise approved by her.
Rihanna was found to have sufficient goodwill in 2012 as a music artist and a style leader in the world of fashion. The principal issue was misrepresentation. The court concluded that a substantial number of purchasers were likely to be deceived into buying the T-shirt because of the false belief that it had been authorised by Rihanna herself…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages.
Data & Information E-Alerts — nuisance calls action plan; £50,000 fine for unlawful calls; simpler security classifications; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 4 April 2014 edition of its Data & Information E-Alerts publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.