Unreasonable decisions — a cautionary tale for trustees
The Royal Court set aside an instrument of appointment excluding beneficiaries from a trust in a trust and divorce context as being a decision which no reasonable trustee could have taken.
Two minor children (aged seven and five and known as A and B) applied, through their guardian ad litem, advocate Mark Temple, to set aside a trust instrument of appointment dated 5 November 2010 (the instrument of appointment). The instrument of appointment was executed in relation to a trust known as the C Trust (the Trust) established in 1993.
At the time of establishment of the Trust, the settlor was married to E (“the Widow”). The Settlor and Widow had one living son (the Father). During the settlor’s lifetime, the father had married H (the Mother), who was born in Peru to a Peruvian father and a Scottish mother. A and B were the children of the Father and the Mother and the grandchildren of the settlor and the Widow (the Grandchildren). Only one of the Grandchildren had been born before the settlor’s death…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
On 11 September the Guernsey Court of Appeal confirmed the test to be applied in determining whether a person should be added as a party to existing proceedings.
When a company is being wound up in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, should an anti-suit injunction be issued to prevent a creditor or member from pursuing proceedings in another jurisdiction?