Unfair relationships — what does the future hold?
The ‘unfair relationship’ concept in respect of credit agreements was introduced into the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) on 6 April 2007. Seven years later, this article reflects on how the provisions of the test have been interpreted and applied by the courts and how the law is likely to develop.
The unfair relationship provisions replaced the former extortionate credit bargain regime. Previously, the court had the power to reopen the credit agreement if it found a credit bargain was such that it required the debtor to make payments that were ‘grossly exorbitant’ or otherwise ‘grossly contravene ordinary principles of fair dealing’. In practice, the courts were generally slow to intervene and these provisions were therefore rarely invoked and even more rarely produced a successful outcome for the debtor.
The Department for Trade and Industry proposed in its 2003 white paper that it should be easier for consumers to challenge unfair agreements and that the definition of ‘extortionate’ should be widened to cover unfair practices both at the time of entering the credit agreement as well as any subsequent events that may have led to unfairness. These proposals formed the basis of the unfair relationship provisions in the CCA…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Mercedes-Benz fined $57m for price-fixing.
Anti-money laundering measure means reporting more to the state.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all