Unfair relationships — what does the future hold?
The ‘unfair relationship’ concept in respect of credit agreements was introduced into the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) on 6 April 2007. Seven years later, this article reflects on how the provisions of the test have been interpreted and applied by the courts and how the law is likely to develop.
The unfair relationship provisions replaced the former extortionate credit bargain regime. Previously, the court had the power to reopen the credit agreement if it found a credit bargain was such that it required the debtor to make payments that were ‘grossly exorbitant’ or otherwise ‘grossly contravene ordinary principles of fair dealing’. In practice, the courts were generally slow to intervene and these provisions were therefore rarely invoked and even more rarely produced a successful outcome for the debtor.
The Department for Trade and Industry proposed in its 2003 white paper that it should be easier for consumers to challenge unfair agreements and that the definition of ‘extortionate’ should be widened to cover unfair practices both at the time of entering the credit agreement as well as any subsequent events that may have led to unfairness. These proposals formed the basis of the unfair relationship provisions in the CCA…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The most important advantage of international arbitration is the enforceability of its result, as a deal is only as reliable as the mechanism by which it can be made legally enforceable.
The Court of Appeal decision in CLP Holding Company Ltd v Singh (1) Kaur (2) prompts consideration of a common oversight in dealing with dilapidations claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe