Unfair dismissal for political views: no need for qualifying service
The requirement for employees to have two years’ service before bringing a claim for unfair dismissal where the reason for dismissal was the employee’s political opinion or affiliation is to be removed. The proposal, contained in amendments to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill currently going through Parliament, comes after the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its decision in Redfearn v United Kingdom.
As the law currently stands, employees are barred from bringing any claims of unfair dismissal without first completing two years’ continuous service with their former employer. Previously the qualifying period was only one year but this was increased in April 2012. Currently, the only exception to this rule is for limited cases involving automatic unfair dismissal e.g. where the reason for the dismissal is pregnancy related…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Case law confirms that HR is essential to supporting management when dealing with employee relations issues; however there is a clear difference between supporting a process and influencing a decision.
As it becomes increasingly common for contractual documentation to be concluded electronically, we examine the pros and cons of e-signatures against traditional wet ink signatures.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…