Undue influence in the context of Schrader v Schrader
It is well known that undue influence is notoriously difficult to establish in the context of a will. Charities that have been involved in undue influence cases in their capacity as beneficiaries will already know that successful cases of this kind are extremely rare, most notably because the main witness is, of course, dead.
Providing evidence about whether that person has been unduly influenced is therefore particularly difficult. In cases of this kind, there needs to be evidence of coercion, which in itself is not easy to prove; persuasion or preying on somebody’s vulnerable or generous nature is simply not enough.
However, much like buses, successful undue influence claims seem to have all come at once in recent months. The most widely talked about of these is Schrader v Schrader. In this case, Mrs Schrader was a 98-year-old widow who had two sons, Nick and Bill. In 2006, she made a will leaving her house, which was the main asset of her estate, to Nick only and her residuary estate (which amounted to virtually nothing) to both Nick and Bill. Under the provisions of her previous will, she had divided her estate between her two sons equally…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why