Uncertainty in dispute resolution clauses
Where a dispute arises under a contract, the parties must attempt to settle that dispute through the procedure set out in the dispute resolution clause (DRC). Sometimes, one party considers that this procedure cannot be followed, or does not adhere to the procedure, and instead initiates proceedings in court to resolve the dispute. Where this occurs, the other party to the contract can apply to the court for a stay of those proceedings in order to force the litigious party to fall back upon the contractual procedure. The court’s power to award a stay is discretionary.
The party opposing the stay must persuade the court that there are good grounds for the court to exercise its discretion to allow the court action to proceed and so preclude the contractual mode of dispute resolution. This can be discharged only by showing that, in the particular case, the dispute is not amenable to resolution by the contractual mechanism the parties have chosen. One of these grounds is that the DRC is void for uncertainty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The US Supreme Court has invalidated federal aggregate limits on individual political contributions in the case McCutcheon et al v Federal Election Commission.
Law à la Mode — April 2014: fashion flair transforms wearable technologies; delivering IT services in the retail sector; and more
DLA Piper has released the April 2014 issue of its Law à la Mode publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery