Uncertainty in dispute resolution clauses
Where a dispute arises under a contract, the parties must attempt to settle that dispute through the procedure set out in the dispute resolution clause (DRC). Sometimes, one party considers that this procedure cannot be followed, or does not adhere to the procedure, and instead initiates proceedings in court to resolve the dispute. Where this occurs, the other party to the contract can apply to the court for a stay of those proceedings in order to force the litigious party to fall back upon the contractual procedure. The court’s power to award a stay is discretionary.
The party opposing the stay must persuade the court that there are good grounds for the court to exercise its discretion to allow the court action to proceed and so preclude the contractual mode of dispute resolution. This can be discharged only by showing that, in the particular case, the dispute is not amenable to resolution by the contractual mechanism the parties have chosen. One of these grounds is that the DRC is void for uncertainty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
China’s eagerly anticipated amendments to its Trademark Law will come into force on 1 May 2014
Tougher product liability provisions following the release of long-awaited amendments to consumer rights and interests protection law in China
The rise of consumerism in China over the past 10 years has spurred greater regulatory enforcement in the area of product liability.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
Our list of the summer’s big deals shows how London law firms kept busy with work from Asia as well as more familiar sources