Uncertainty in dispute resolution clauses
Where a dispute arises under a contract, the parties must attempt to settle that dispute through the procedure set out in the dispute resolution clause (DRC). Sometimes, one party considers that this procedure cannot be followed, or does not adhere to the procedure, and instead initiates proceedings in court to resolve the dispute. Where this occurs, the other party to the contract can apply to the court for a stay of those proceedings in order to force the litigious party to fall back upon the contractual procedure. The court’s power to award a stay is discretionary.
The party opposing the stay must persuade the court that there are good grounds for the court to exercise its discretion to allow the court action to proceed and so preclude the contractual mode of dispute resolution. This can be discharged only by showing that, in the particular case, the dispute is not amenable to resolution by the contractual mechanism the parties have chosen. One of these grounds is that the DRC is void for uncertainty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
On 22 July 2014, a new law amending the Law on Data Protection and Law on Information was signed off by the Russian president and thus was officially adopted.
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established on 8 August 1967 under the framework of the ‘three pillars’ of regional co-operation
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions