Un-safe Harbor: is Safe Harbor an adequate means of protecting EU personal data transferred to the US?
The US Safe Harbor framework was developed in 2000 by the US Department of Commerce in collaboration with the European Commission (EC) to provide an adequate level of protection for EU businesses that transfer personal data to the US companies so as to enable them to comply with the data export requirements of the EU Data Protection Directive.
Under the framework, US businesses can self-certify on an annual basis that they will comply with a binding set of principles. Although the arrangement is voluntary, once a business signs up to the Safe Harbor register it assumes various legal obligations that are enforced by the US’s Federal Trade Commission.
Since its introduction, many in the EU have been sceptical about the security offered by Safe Harbor — primarily due to perceived shortcomings in the self-certification process. In 2013, a number of high-profile European people and organisations added to or joined the debate (including the German commissioners, the European data protection supervisor, the chairman of the Article 29 Working Party and the EC). Most expressed concern, particularly in light of revelations in the press that the US government has been carrying out mass surveillance of its European allies…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
If you think that the Housing Grants Act makes payment (or not) clear, keep reading for the latest case...
You may be forgiven for thinking that as of 27 February 2015, the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the Act), has little effect in terms of its payment and adjudication provisions.
Arnold J does battle again with the complexities of European Trade Mark law in a dispute about the trademark SUPREME for foodstuffs for rabbits and other small animals.