UK Pensions Speedbrief: more litigation on RPI/CPI
Just more than four years ago, the government announced that the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) would be used in place of the Retail Prices Index (RPI) as the standard index for determining pension increases in the public sector. This has fed through into the statutory requirements for revaluation of deferred pensions and increases in payment of pensions under private sector defined-benefit occupational schemes.
The results have, however, been haphazard, depending on the way individual scheme rules had interpreted the statutory provisions. Some schemes have found that their revaluation and/or increases have changed automatically to CPI; others have found that RPI had been (in some cases unwittingly) ‘hard-wired’; and others have been left uncertain as to the answer and as to whether there was any discretion to choose between the two.
We are aware of numerous cases where trustees or companies are referring the issues to the courts for guidance. The latest judgment is Arcadia Group Ltd v Arcadia Group Pension Trust Ltd and another. This confirms the earlier private sector case, Danks v QinetiQ Holdings (2012), and follows the trend of the public sector cases R (Staff Side of the Police Negotiating Board and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2011) and R (FDA and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2012) in suggesting that the judges, who have themselves had their pensions changed to CPI, are not inclined to interpret rules so as to put obstacles in the way of the move towards CPI in the public and private sectors, but rather to leave trustees and/or employers with considerable discretion. However, there has as yet been no judicial guidance as to how trustees who are left with a discretion as to which index to apply should go about exercising this…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Initiative aims to encourage development of urban areas but will it have the desired effect?
30% female non-execs on German boards; lower penalty for failing to consult a works council in France; mandatory retirement no more in Denmark; all the UK changes; and more.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all