UK HR ebrief: pension scheme closures and changes — significant High Court decision

The High Court, in IBM UK v Dalgleish and others, found that an employer had breached its implied duty of good faith in the way it went about closing its defined-benefit (DB) schemes to the future accrual of benefits. The case emphasises the need for employers to tread very carefully when planning and implementing changes to DB schemes. This briefing considers its practical implications for employers.

The facts are very complicated and involve more than 5,000 members spread over two schemes and various benefit structures. In summary, IBM decided to make a range of changes to two of its DB schemes between 2009 and 2011. This was known as ‘Project Waltz’ and involved closure to the future accrual of benefits, imposing new early retirement terms and withholding pay rises from DB scheme members who did not agree to break the link between DB pension accrual and final salary.

IBM planned to close to future accrual by using an ‘exclusion power’ in the scheme rules. This said that the principal employer could exclude ‘any specified person or class of persons’ from membership…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Eversheds

View more briefings from Eversheds

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


1 Wood Street

Turnover (£m): 382
No. of lawyers: 1,218 (UK 200)
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 5
No. of qualified lawyers: 52 (International 50)
No. of partners: 20


View all jobs from this firm