Twelve-month non-competition restrictive covenant enforceable against financial adviser
Merlin Financial Consultants Ltd v Cooper, concerning 12-month non-competition restrictive covenants, suggests that they are easier to enforce in the financial services sector because of the strong relationships between advisers and clients, which are a particular feature of that industry. The courts seem to be showing greater willingness generally to uphold such clauses, in appropriate circumstances.
Mr Cooper was a financial adviser (with more than 23 years’ experience) who worked for Merlin Financial Consultants). Mr Cooper entered into an agreement with Merlin under which Merlin paid him £43,200 for the right to receive income from Mr Cooper’s existing client base. This agreement contained covenants that prevented Mr Cooper from competing with Merlin in any capacity for a period of 12 months post employment. Mr Cooper’s separate employment contract contained similar, but more limited, restrictions…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The NPPG includes a proposal that a financial credit should be applied to affordable housing contributions where buildings are brought back into use or demolished in order to allow redevelopment.
Inflation has, in recent years, occupied an almost permanent slot in our news headlines.