Turning point for enforceable ‘friendly discussions’ before arbitration
In a recent controversial decision, the court held that a dispute resolution clause, which required the parties to the contract to enter into ‘friendly discussion’ before arbitration proceedings were started, was enforceable.
The reason that this decision is controversial is that it is seemingly at odds with the existing English law. In general, English law does not recognise an agreement to negotiate or an agreement to settle disputes amicably. In previous cases, such agreements have been held ‘too uncertain’ to enforce. As such, this case appears to mark a turning point in the enforcement of such clauses under English law.
The background facts of the dispute are not particularly relevant. It is sufficient to simply say that a dispute arose between the parties and the contract contained a clause that they should seek to resolve any dispute by ‘friendly discussion…for a continuous period of four weeks’. If a resolution was not achieved, the dispute could then be referred to arbitration…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley Plc
With effect from 1 October 2015, the right to take a short service refund from a defined contribution occupational scheme will be abolished.
Being sued is bad, but it’s worse if you are running up substantial costs in defending a claim while in fear that the claimant may not have the means to compensate you if you win.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Gateley bigshots see personal wealth soar on flotation, but face penalties for early exit .
Gateley is to float on the London Stock Exchange, becoming the first UK firm to list itself as a public limited company. But why would a firm would look to float, and what it could mean for the industry?