TUPE transfer: employed immediately before the transfer?

In the recent case of Bangura v Southern Cross Healthcare Group Plc, the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the question of whether an employee could be protected by Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) — a decision that has implications for many ISH providers.

In this case, Ms Bangura had been dismissed prior to the transfer, but an appeal against her recent dismissal was outstanding at the time of both the transfer and the Employment Tribunal hearing.

Ms Bangura worked at a care home operated by Southern Cross. She was dismissed by reason of gross misconduct. Ms Bangura appealed this decision…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • head1

    LPOver and out?

    The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why


Fountain House
130 Fenchurch Street

Turnover (£m): 79.50
No. of lawyers: 367