TUPE: service provision change occurred despite significant change in the way activities carried out post-transfer
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the Employment Tribunal’s approach towards identifying whether there had been a service provision change (SPC) and held that the ‘activities’ undertaken before and after a change in service provision were essentially the same, despite being carried out in a different way. Accordingly, a TUPE transfer had occurred (Qlog Ltd v O’Brien and others).
The claim concerned drivers who were employed by a haulage company, McCarthy, which had provided transportation and delivery services to Ribble. Ribble ended its agreement with McCarthy and instead started to use Qlog for its transportation and delivery requirements. Whereas McCarthy had its own vehicles and directly employed drivers to provide the services to Ribble, Qlog had no employed drivers or vehicles and, instead, acted as a middleman putting each delivery out to tender to haulage contractors who delivered the goods, while Qlog remained contractually responsible to Ribble for the deliveries. The drivers did not transfer to Qlog and were dismissed. They claimed their dismissal was unfair. Qlog argued that there had been no SPC because the service they provided was different to the service provided by McCarthy…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Consultations released on implementation of energy efficiency regulation of the private rented sector
The Department for Energy & Climate Change has published the long-awaited consultation on implementing the provisions of the Energy Act 2011.
The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court judge’s decision to add words to a non-compete restriction, which had originally offered the employer very little protection.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.