TUPE reform: ‘regeneration’ rather than ‘extermination’ for gold-plating
TUPE reform has long been part of the government’s proposals to cut red tape, ease the regulatory burden on businesses and remove UK provisions that go further than required by Europe (so-called ‘gold-plating’ of European Directives when they are implemented into domestic legislation). The government has now published the draft regulations for TUPE reform: the draft Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2013. This cumbersome title heralds some of the problems the government has faced with implementing its proposals. Set out below is an overview of the draft regulations and a table summarising the key amendments.
The government now accepts that even though the service provision change (SPC) concept goes further than required by the Acquired Rights Directive (ARD), it provides certainty and is beneficial to all parties. In fact, it is ‘good regulation’.
So, the SPC concept remains but the new definition confirms that the ‘activities’ that transfer must be ‘fundamentally’ the same as the activities carried out ‘previously’. The intention is to reflect the position that we had got to under recent case law. The government considered that this requirement for similarity between the ‘activities’ pre- and post-transfer may not be generally appreciated, so it has specifically incorporated it into the SPC test…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Wragge & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge & Co
Wragge & Co outlines the background to the case and the court’s decision and provides a comment on its impact for public bodies.
The Court of Appeal case of RWE Npower Renewables Ltd v J N Bentley Ltd acts as a reminder to draftsman not to place too much reliance on these clauses.