TUPE — employment tribunal’s discretion to identify activity
By Michael Halsey
In Qlog Ltd v O’Brien, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed the wide discretion employment tribunals have to determine whether an activity was fundamentally the same after a TUPE transfer as it was before.
In this case, the tribunal was justified in placing significant weight on the terms of the contractual documents between the parties.
Ribble manufactures cardboard packaging and engages a contractor to deliver the products to customers. Between 2008 and 2011, the delivery contract was held by McCarthy Haulage. McCarthy employed staff who worked in Ribble’s factory and drivers to deliver to customers. McCarthy’s employees in the factory loaded the delivery vehicles…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories