Truth be told: the new defence of truth under section 2, Defamation Act 2013
By Amber Melville-Brown
‘The truth is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.’ They are the wise words of Prof Dumbledore of Hogwarts fame. Whether or not it is beautiful and terrible, a new statutory defence of ‘truth’ has replaced the old defence of justification.
Under the old rules, while an allegation might have been defamatory in that it tended to lower the claimant in the estimation of right-minded members of society, the defendant would escape liability if he were able to show that the allegations were true or substantially true. The new statutory defence of truth is an attempt by the legislature to reflect and consolidate the ever-increasing body of case law that has developed over the years.
We have already set out that, under the new act, for a claim to be defamatory it must have caused or be likely to have caused the claimant serious harm to his reputation. Now, such a statement will be defensible under the new section 2 if the defendant can prove that ‘the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Withers briefing.
News from Withers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Withers
22 April 2014 marked ‘the largest reform of the family justice system any of us have seen or will see in our professional lifetimes’, according to the president of the Family Division.
Withers’ Graham Elliott discusses the points he found most interesting from this year’s Charity Tax Group annual meeting.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A merged Withers and Speechly Bircham would have scaled The Lawyer’s UK 200 with a turnover of about £170m, and created one of the world’s largest specialist private client teams. So what went wrong?