Transport legal update: Griffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Ltd (The Griffon)  EWHC 593 (Comm)
In Griffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Ltd (The Griffon), Teare J considered, in the context of clause 13 of the standard form Norwegian Sale Form (NSF) 1993, where a buyer fails to pay the deposit under a memorandum of agreement (MoA), whether the seller’s claim is limited to compensation for its actual losses or whether the seller is entitled to the deposit amount.
On 28 April 2010, Griffon Shipping (the seller) agreed to sell the M/V Griffon to Firodi Shipping (the buyer) at a price of $22m (£13m). On 1 May 2010, an MoA on NSF 1993 was signed. Clause 2 of the MoA provided that the buyer was obliged to pay a deposit of 10 per cent ($2.156m) within three banking days of signature (i.e. by 5 May 2010).
The deposit was not paid within three banking days and on 6 May 2010 the seller accepted the buyer’s conduct as a repudiation of the MoA and/or cancelled the MoA pursuant to an express contractual right to do so. The buyer accepted that its failure to pay the deposit was a repudiatory breach…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The true ownership of a domain name and the type of rights therein are more complicated than they might at first appear
UCITS V regulates the remuneration policy of UCITS management companies.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all