Transfer pricing court cases
A series of tax disputes involving Russian automotive market distributors (namely Mazda Motors Rus, Suzuki Motors Rus and Hyundai Motor CIS), and the application of article 40 RF TC, is currently before the commercial courts. The distributors posted losses for 2009–10, which, in the opinion of the Russian tax authorities, shows that the multinational automotive corporations shifted profit by applying overstated transfer prices with dependent distributors in Russia. These court cases may affect the application of ‘new’ transfer pricing rules.
On 17 July 2014, the Moscow District Federal Arbitration Court returned the Mazda Motors Rus case for retrial on the basis that the lower court had not examined the possibility of the tax authorities applying the comparable uncontrolled price for identical/homogeneous goods method (article 40.4 RF TC). The tax authority’s assertion that there were no identical/homogeneous goods on the market because Mazda Motors Rus is the exclusive dealer of Mazda vehicles in Russia was not, in the opinion of the cassation court, sufficient for application of the resale price method (MD FAC No. А40-4381/13 of 12 July 2014)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
‘Inversion’ transactions are nothing new, and the current proceedings appear to be just another replay of earlier games of tag between the government and US multinationals.
In Devon Canada Corporation v The Queen, the issue is whether the taxpayer may deduct $20,884,041 paid to cancel issued stock options.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.