Trademarks: the Italian Supreme Court rules on the ‘gold battle’ between food companies Barilla and Saiwa
With the decision no. 5099 dated 5 March 2014, the Supreme Court, upholding the Milan Court of Appeal decision, denied that the word ‘Oro’ (Italian for ‘gold’), as part of the compound trademark ‘Oro Saiwa’, is capable of being distinctive.
The proceeding between the two food companies started in 2002, when Saiwa sued Barilla Alimentare before the Court of Milan claiming the nullity of the sign ‘Oro’ as part of the compound trademark ‘Selezione Oro Barilla’. Saiwa alleged that Barilla’s ‘Oro’ trademark was anticipated by its prior trademarks ‘Oro Saiwa’, ‘Pacco Oro Saiwa’, ‘Pacco Oro’, Italian trademark ‘Oro’ and international trademark ‘Oro’. Furthermore, Saiwa also requested to ascertain the infringement of its trademarks and the unfair competition by the defendant.
Barilla appeared in that proceeding requesting the dismissal of counterpart’s claims and requesting the judge to declare the nullity of trademarks ‘Oro’ owned by Saiwa, as being devoid of distinctive character…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
EU Court of Justice holds trade dress of flagship store eligible for trademark registration under EU law
The EU Court of Justice has ruled in favour of the eligibility for registration as a trademark, under EU law, of the overall appearance, trade dress and design of a flagship store.
Copyright — the on-screen copies and cached copies made by a user are licit also without the authorisation of the copyright holder
By a judgment issued on 5 June, the European Court of Justice has ruled on the interpretation of article 5 of Directive 2001/29/CE.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms