Trademarks, search tools and keyword advertising: Lush takes on Amazon and triumphs
On 10 February 2014, John Baldwin QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, delivered a noteworthy judgment concerning the use of trademarks in keyword advertising and in the search results returned by website search tools.
This judgment followed a bitter dispute between the prominent online retailer Amazon and the high-street cosmetics brand Lush, well known for its colourful soaps and bath bombs.
Lush was the exclusive licensee of Community Trade Mark 1388313 for the word ‘Lush’ in respect of cosmetics and toiletries in class 3. The aptly named Cosmetic Warriors was the proprietor. For the purposes of the judgment, the two were not treated as distinct…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Do employers, especially those employing professionals and people in positions of trust, need to do more due diligence than they might have previously carried out?
Firms carrying on consumer-credit-related regulated activity need to ensure they are complying with the requirements set out in the Consumer Credit Sourcebook (CONC).