Trademark case — saved by an S: Asos vs Assos

In a wide-ranging trademark infringement and validity case between two clothing manufacturers with almost identical marks, ASSOS and ASOS, the High Court reviewed the approach to be taken to many issues that arise frequently when considering trademark conflicts.

These included when earlier use will count as an ‘earlier trademark’, what evidence can support an allegation of confusing similarity, dilution and the own-name defence. On almost all issues, it found in favour of the defendant, Asos. The case provides a useful illustration of how infringement cannot be readily assumed, even where there are two very similar marks.

The claimants are a Swiss-based manufacturer of high-end cycling clothing. They have been in business since the late 1970s and owned EU trademark registrations for a number of ‘ASSOS’ marks, both as word marks and as logos. The defendants are an online clothing retailer first established in 1999 to sell clothes and homewares similar to those of celebrities. The brand is an acronym for ‘as seen on screen’. At first it sold other parties’ goods but gradually started selling clothes bearing its own brand. Assos sued Asos for trademark infringement, which counterclaimed for invalidity of the Assos marks…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below. 

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

  • Money 317

    Crunch boom

    Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town

View more analysis from The Lawyer

Overview

5 New Street Square
London
EC4A 3TW
UK
http://www.taylorwessing.com

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of Lawyers: 860
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 79
Offices (Asia Pacific): 3

Jobs