Trademark case — saved by an S: Asos vs Assos
In a wide-ranging trademark infringement and validity case between two clothing manufacturers with almost identical marks, ASSOS and ASOS, the High Court reviewed the approach to be taken to many issues that arise frequently when considering trademark conflicts.
These included when earlier use will count as an ‘earlier trademark’, what evidence can support an allegation of confusing similarity, dilution and the own-name defence. On almost all issues, it found in favour of the defendant, Asos. The case provides a useful illustration of how infringement cannot be readily assumed, even where there are two very similar marks.
The claimants are a Swiss-based manufacturer of high-end cycling clothing. They have been in business since the late 1970s and owned EU trademark registrations for a number of ‘ASSOS’ marks, both as word marks and as logos. The defendants are an online clothing retailer first established in 1999 to sell clothes and homewares similar to those of celebrities. The brand is an acronym for ‘as seen on screen’. At first it sold other parties’ goods but gradually started selling clothes bearing its own brand. Assos sued Asos for trademark infringement, which counterclaimed for invalidity of the Assos marks…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
For the tax year from 6 April 2014, the standard lifetime allowance has reduced from £1.5m to £1.25m.
One of the areas highlighted last year by the Regulator was the regulation of workplace DC pension schemes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world