Trade Dress Watch: a case for counterfeit trade dress
By Gina Durham
Can a product that imitates the look and feel of another product, but does not use the trademarked brand name, still be considered a ‘counterfeit’ product under US law? Owners of popular brands (such as Louis Vuitton and Tiffany) are well acquainted with the counterfeiters’ practice of applying their brand name or logo to fake goods and often respond with a claim pursuant to Section 32 of the Lanham Act alleging use of a ‘counterfeit mark’.
What is less clear is whether a counterfeit claim under Section 32 will be successful if the alleged ‘counterfeit mark’ is trade dress, rather than a word mark or a well-known logo mark.
The Lanham Act defines a ‘counterfeit mark’ as ‘a counterfeit of a mark that is registered on the principal register in the US Patent and Trademark Office for such goods or services sold, offered for sale or distributed and that is in use, whether or not the person against whom relief is sought knew such mark was so registered’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Investment in US real estate by non-US investors is increasing.
Last December, bitcoin prices plummeted by nearly half, after Chinese authorities banned all financial institutions in China from engaging in bitcoin-related business.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions