Towns and village greens: clarification at last
By Martin Garner
An application to register land as a town and village green was once a dangerous weapon that could be used by anyone (predominantly local campaigners) to try and prevent redevelopment.
The law surrounding the registration of town and village greens was complicated and riddled with conflicting decisions. However, in Barkas v North Yorkshire County Council , the Supreme Court clarified the law and simplified the ‘as of right’ test used to determine whether land is capable of registration as a town or village green and therefore cannot be redeveloped without the permission of the government.
In Barkas, Scarborough Borough Council had been the owner of a field since 1951. The field had originally been acquired by the local authority as part of a much larger parcel of land developed for housing. However, the field in question was retained by the council and kept as ‘recreation grounds’ under section 12(1) of the Housing Act 1985…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
The court considered the application of two clauses seeking to exclude and limit liability in the case of Polypearl Ltd v E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd.
Clauses that were a rarity three or four years ago are now increasingly being tabled in the negotiation phase of a building contract or consultant’s appointment.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem