Time to say grace? DECC sets out its proposals for RO grace periods
With the Renewables Obligation (RO) scheme of support for new schemes to be phased out by 31 March 2017 and the replacement Contracts for Difference scheme coming into effect next year, there will be a period of time in which developers will have a choice of which scheme to seek support under. For those that elect to seek support under the RO, generally speaking the facility must be commissioned and accredited by 31 March 2017, otherwise it will have to seek support under the Contracts for Difference scheme. However, the government has recognised that there may be some reasons outside the developer’s control that a project may be delayed beyond 31 March 2017 and so has issued a consultation on what grace periods will be available in such circumstances.
The government’s position is that, in general, operators of projects that have commissioning dates on or close to 31 March 2017 have the option of applying for a contract for difference, which would give them clear assurance of receiving support even if the project suffers unexpected delay. Because developers have known about this date for several years, the Department for Energy & Climate Change (DECC) remains minded to keep grace-period eligibility minimal.
It recognises that there are certain specific challenges that developers are experiencing at present, which it believes can best be addressed via more substantive grace periods, but proposes to target grace periods directly at those challenges, and where appropriate, rather than considering more extensive grace periods in general…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
DECC has released its report summarising the responses received and action to be taken regarding underground access for gas, oil and geothermal developers.
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.