‘Time thereby lost’ under the NYPE off-hire clause: Court of Appeal reinstates conventional approach
The Athena was a dispute about the meaning of the familiar NYPE off-hire clause (clause 15).
The Commercial Court decision gave rise to a lot of controversy. It went against conventional principles for determining whether a vessel is off hire. The talking point of the decision was the meaning given to the words ‘time thereby lost’, allowing owners to defeat an off-hire claim on the basis that there had been no loss of time on the ‘charter service overall’. This treated the claim akin to one for damages, whereas the off-hire regime is different from damages: it operates irrespective of fault or breach.
However, the Court of Appeal has rejected this approach, set aside the Commercial Court decision and restored the award of the arbitrators. The award follows the usual way of assessing loss of time, namely in terms of the ‘service immediately required of the vessel’, not ‘the charter service overall’. The Court of Appeal considered this to be the correct legal test. Applying this test, it allowed charterers to succeed on their off-hire claim…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
Ince & Co provides an overview of the contractual issues that may arise should matters escalate in Ukraine.
The recent case of Astipalaia v Hanjin Shenzhen  EWHC 120 (Admlty) has revisited the existing case law on assessment of damages following a collision.