Thinking of ending a contract? What if there’s no notice to terminate provision?
It is well-established law that contracts that do not state their duration or explain how to deal with their termination can be terminated by one or both of the contractual parties giving reasonable notice.
That’s all very well, but it leaves the crucial question: what constitutes reasonable notice?
A recent case dealt with just this issue. The claimant, Hamsard, and various of its predecessor companies supplied clothes to the defendant, Boots, under a variety of trading arrangements. After a rocky period in their dealings, Boots gave Hamsard nine months’ notice to terminate their agreement (which was not in writing). Hamsard argued that was unreasonable; the court disagreed…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.