The winding up of BVI and Cayman Islands companies in Hong Kong
British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Cayman Islands companies have long been a valuable feature of commercial life in Hong Kong and China. Such companies offer many benefits, including flexibility, asset security and tax-neutral status. Both the BVI and the Cayman Islands enjoy advanced legal and regulatory infrastructures derived from the English common law, together with longstanding political and judicial stability, making them ideal jurisdictions for corporate domicile.
In most cases, the simplest and most cost effective route to wind-up such companies will be to commence proceedings against them in their home jurisdictions. Unaware of this fact, it is still relatively common for individuals to commence proceedings in respect of such companies in other jurisdictions, principally those jurisdictions in which they do business, seeking to rely on the foreign court’s jurisdiction to wind up a “foreign company”.
In several such recent cases, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance has confirmed that whilst it possesses an ‘exorbitant’ jurisdiction to wind up foreign companies, it will only do so where such companies have a sufficiently strong connection with Hong Kong…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mourant Ozannes
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
What is the role of the Royal Court of Jersey in trustee applications for directions regarding disclosure of trust information?
A recent application has raised the issue of the function of the court, namely whether the court was exercising its own discretion in supervising, and intervening, in the administration of a trust.
Royal Court clarifies limits of customary law exception in respect of time-barred breach-of-trust claims brought by incoming trustee
Where a newly incorporated PTC recently appointed as successor trustee seeks to bring claims for breach of trust against predecessors, it will not be able to benefit from empêchement d’agir.