The use of the VAM in an equity investment scheme
By You Yang, Lin Kaiyi and Zhao Zhihan
The Haifu Case caused the private equity industry consternation until a clarifying judgment from the Supreme People’s Court of China (the Supreme Court) in December 2012. The Supreme Court overruled the second instance court’s opinion that PE investments are ‘joint risk sharing’ and investors are not entitled to a guaranteed profit without regard to the performance of the business.
The Supreme Court recognised the legitimacy of the PE investment model, fully considered all the various interests of the project company, the creditors of the project company and the shareholders of the project company, distinguished VAM (Valuation Adjustment Mechanism) agreements between the project company and the shareholders from VAM agreements between the company shareholders, and affirmed the validity of the latter with certain prerequisites.
The Haifu Case has significant implications not only for PE firms, but also for the investment industry, which may find guidance from it when designing equity investment structures…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Principals and contractors need to be aware that in not registering security interests under the PPSA 2009, they may risk serious consequences.
The New Companies Ordinance (NCO) will come into effect on 3 March 2014. It includes changes that affect the way documents may be executed.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out