The US tax rescission doctrine: when the parties want an agreement to disappear
By Eric D Ryan and Joe Helm
The old saw about the best-laid plans of mice and men also goes for international tax planning and transactions with significant tax consequences.
Sometimes the business and/or financial assumptions around the planning turn out to be mistaken, sometimes the resulting structure turns out to be too complex to manage relative to the savings it produces and sometimes parties just mutually decide to back out of a deal after some or all of its parts have been executed. What is to be done when the consequences of such a transaction or set of transactions might create undesirable commercial or tax effects?
Most of the time, the answer is, unfortunately, not much, absent ‘strong proof’ that the form of the transaction did not comport with the parties’ intent, or mistake (in the formal legal sense) or fraud (in other words, the common law grounds for unilateral rescission) — circumstances quite challenging to find in the inter-company context. It may be that the parties need to terminate the original agreement and transfer assets and liabilities back between them at the then-current values — thus creating two separate transactions, with separate, likely unwanted, consequences…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.