The Sharp End: winter 2013 — time to check your relationship status
By Ben Mercer and Joanne Wallace
New measures intended to be implemented by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will have a significant impact on companies with controlling shareholders who are premium listed and also on those companies considering joining the premium segment. They follow the regulator’s assessment of the premium listing regime over the last couple of years, as it considered how to bolster minority shareholder protection without risking damage to London’s attractiveness as a listing venue.
In its October 2012 paper ‘Enhancing the effectiveness of the Listing Regime’ (CP 12/25), the then Financial Services Authority (FSA) presented a package of measures for consultation. The FCA recently published CP 13/15, both a feedback document with a set of near final rules not open to comment and a consultation paper with draft rules on revised areas and new proposals. It is not only controlled companies that are affected by the consultation; a number of proposals are applicable to all premium listed companies and a couple apply to the standard segment. The FCA has calculated that there are some 50 premium listed companies that have a controlling shareholder or are structured in a way that would not comply with the new voting arrangements for premium listing issues.
Relationship agreements aren’t anything new. They continued to be used after the removal of the old controlling shareholder provisions from the Listing Rules in 2005. Although thought to be a valuable tool in regulating the relationship between a controlling shareholder and a new applicant, there were concerns that they were ineffective if not complied with and were often ignored after listing. Now, an agreement between a company and its controlling shareholder will be mandatory, although it will not need to be called a ‘relationship agreement’. In setting minimum requirements for their content and consequences for their breach, the hope is that they will become more credible. While rejecting requests for permanent ‘grandfathering’, the FCA is proposing a transitional period of six months for companies already listed to comply…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe