The relevance of market expert evidence in determining whether a deal has been done
This briefing focuses on Proton Energy Group SA v Public Company Orlen Lietuva  EWHC (Comm). In this case, in the context of an application for summary judgment, the Commercial Court considered whether or not there was a real issue to be tried as to whether a binding contract had been concluded between the parties based on a review of their negotiations.
Proton Energy Group SA (Proton), a Swiss trader of oil and gasoline related products, and Publicv Company Orlen Lietuva (Orlen), a petroleum refining company incorporated in Lithuania, exchanged e-mails regarding the sale and purchase of crude oil mix. The parties accepted that the following exchanges had occurred:
- Proton e-mailed Orlen a “firm offer” to sell CIF Butinge, Lithuania 25,000mt +/- 10% in Seller’s option of crude oil mix CN27090090, European origin as per the specifications attached, with delivery period at the discharge port during 10-15 July 2012 and at a price based on five quotations after the bill of lading date.
- E-mail correspondence continued between the parties on the same day, culminating in a oneword e-mail from Orlen stating “Confirmed”…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The recent case of Astipalaia v Hanjin Shenzhen  EWHC 120 (Admlty) has revisited the existing case law on assessment of damages following a collision.
In 2013, ILS products became more popular and, importantly, products which traditional P&C reinsurers started to actively engage with and underwrite.