The prior registration of a domain name does not prevent the registration of a posterior community trademark
With judgment rendered on 14 May 2013 (joint cases T-321/11 and T-322/11), the EU General Court confirmed OHIM’s decision to reject two oppositions against a trademark application, both based on the prior registration and alleged use of the same word as a domain name.
The two oppositions were based on article 8, paragraph 4, of the Community Trademark Regulation (CTR) No. 207/2009, which considers the ‘use in the course of trade’ of a sign to be a valid ground for refusal of registration of a posterior trademark…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
Also: EU’s 2016 Work Programme reflects Juncker mantra to limit the amount of legislation; and more
Can the bankruptcy receiver terminate a commitment to sell property if the purchaser has already registered the court claim with the land registry?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms