The price of success in the Patents County Court — especially on a CFA
The very recent patent infringement case of Scopema SARL v Scot Seat Direct Ltd has demonstrated just how ruthless the costs-capping regime can be in the Patents County Court (PCC).
The claimant brought a claim for patent infringement against the defendant. The end result at trial, which lasted only half a day, was that the defendant succeeded in defending the claim by persuading the court that its product did not infringe the claimant’s patent. It had based its defence on three main non-infringement arguments. It only really succeeded in relation to one of those threads of argument — although of course this was sufficient for a finding of non-infringement.
The proceedings then moved to the consideration of costs and there was a separate hearing on the point. The claimant admitted that the defendant was the winner overall, and so in the usual course of things the claimant would have to pay the defendant’s reasonable costs. However, this was the PCC, so the recovery of costs was always going to be subject to the £50,000 cap. In addition, given that a couple of the defendant’s arguments had failed to persuade the trial judge, the claimant sought a reduction on the amount of costs it would have to pay to the defendant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
How can companies respond?
Justin Coley shares his observations arising from the amended forms N120 (Particulars of Claim for mortgaged residential premises) and N123 (Mortgage pre-action protocol checklist).
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.